A representative of The Woodsmen, LLC, an Atlanta-based corporation, recently posted information on the lake site. Since The Woodsmen, LLC has owned 406 Suncrest Blvd., a property in our community since 2024, their representative has the right to post to the site just as all other owners are encouraged to do.
Unfortunately, the information posted by The Woodsmen, LLC is not completely accurate. In an effort to help all of our neighbors have a complete and accurate picture of the facts, the Board would like to point you to some source documents that you can read for yourself. All the documents referenced are available on the lake website under Lake Documents – Talahi Lake. Please check them out.
The first is a document titled “Talahi-Lake-Management-Corporation-Grantors-8_13_1981.” In this document, you will see that all sections of Talahi Lake Estates are mentioned. No exceptions, no exclusions. You will also see the word “covenant” in the document. It shows the markings where it has been filed with the county. To assert that there are sections of our community that “have no current covenants in place” is factually inaccurate. The Woodsmen, LLC is aware that this covenant exists, as it is the binding document that imposes our annual lake dues, which The Woodsmen, LLC has paid each year since it has owned property in our community.
Other documents you may review are the meeting minutes and budgets for the last three years. In three consecutive annual public meetings, the budget was presented, discussed, and accepted by the community members present. It was posted for all to see after the meeting and has been open for public comment each year. Upon careful examination of those budgets, you will see that legal fees were budgeted. The Woodsmen, LLC seems to imply that the Board is somehow misappropriating funds when it uses the funds budgeted, in the manner budgeted, and within the amounts approved by the community. This is an inaccurate representation of the facts.
The Woodsmen, LLC also asserts that the Board is operating outside of its mandate. Again, please refer to the documents posted, where you can find the by-laws, which do not tell the Board to do this or that explicitly. The Woodsmen, LLC, is attempting to portray a set of restrictions on the lake management that simply do not exist.
One fact that The Woodsmen, LLC gets correct is that several docks on the Lake have covers, which directly violates the Lake Use Agreement. Since they have only owned property for a couple of years, The Woodsmen, LLC can be forgiven for not knowing the history of those docks. Long before Woodsmen, LLC came to Talahi Lake Estates, the first covered dock was proposed for the Lake. Those of you who are long-time residents will surely remember that there was much discussion at the time. Ultimately, the Board decided to allow the covered dock. In doing so, the Board established a precedent which has been continued through the intervening decades in a spirit of fairness to others who wanted covered docks. Any enforcement of restrictions on docks, fences, outbuildings , or any other lake-use rules should include consideration of exemptions or similar process to ensure equity.
In the end, the Woodsmen, LLC encourages everyone to refuse to participate in the voting process. You have an opportunity under the law to make your voice heard.. Vote for, vote against – Agree or disagree, but do not stop participating and trying to make things better.
As soon as the voting is finalized there will be a called meeting to share results, discuss next steps and elect new board members.
Finally, the Board would ask everyone to remember that we are a community of neighbors who love the Lake and all that it offers. One person’s “busybody” is another person’s caring neighbor. In all that we do, let’s treat one another with dignity and respect free from name-calling and litigious threats.
The Board of Directors
Talahi Lake Property Owners Association, Inc.
4 Responses
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Can please help me understand why when I called the county and inquired they told me that I do not have any restrictive covenants listed on my deed? You are saying that there are the restrictive covenants filed, but there are none on my deed. But it is my understanding that since I do not have any restrictive covenants listed on my deed that you cannot force me into a POA even if 2/3 of my neighbors vote for it. Is that not correct? It sure would be nice to be getting more information and this update is long overdue. The vote was a long time ago and we’ve heard nothing since then.
Rebecca, I’m down at county records now. I talked with Trudy. I asked her about calling to the department here and asking if they had restrictive covenants that were on their property. She said they would not look that up for them. They do not do research. She said that you would need a lawyer to prove that you have or do not have covenants.
As far as them looking up a deed and it says there are no restrictive covenants. She says that happens nine out of 10 times. The lawyers are supposed to put that on, but they are often missing. She said it does not mean that you do not have restrictive covenants.
You can check the website and you will find Restrictive Covenants for Section 5 which you are in, the Granters Agreement and the Land Use Agreement. All of these cover your property.
I hope this answers your questions.
Renee
We have spoken with the county repeatedly. They have registered our affadavit and we have no restrictions. All this information has been reviewed by a lawyer. I don’t trust the current board and won’t participate or fund any of your activities until ordered to by the court. Please vacate immediately and begin legitimate elections. You keep saying nothing will change but that’s hard to believe with all the effort and subterfuge coming from you guys.
I want to make sure it is known, the job of Superior County Clerks office has many roles. I was needing to specific BK and page # for our deed. I called county and they spent about 8 minutes over the phone guiding me through their website. Once established a request was needed she told me how to accomplish that. Once submitting my request it took about 30 minutes, and it was Trudy who went and researched the request I needed, signed and sealed it, and emailed it to me. Her signature on the lined of “prepared by deputy clerk” shows they most certainly are able to tell owners what is on their deed. Lawyer is not needed to prove we do. But a lawyer has for sure double checked for us.